Hand-drawn Buddha symbol and buddha chronicle wordmark
Based on the sutras, the Vinaya and later commentaries
About the Sources

King Bimbisāra is put to death by his son Ajātasattu

Attested across multiple schools

After handing over the throne, is put to death by his son ; this event is recorded by five schools. The say that Ajātasattu, following , shut his father in a smoke-house (a sealed room heated with smoke) and cut off his food, allowing only to visit; the queen hid food in her clothes, her hair-knot and her shoes, and later smeared honey on her body for the king to lick, but all of this was forbidden. The king kept himself alive by the bliss of walking slowly back and forth (walking meditation), so Ajātasattu ordered a barber to cut open the soles of his feet, rub in salt and oil, and roast them over charcoal. The king died recollecting the Buddha, the Dhamma and the Sangha, and was reborn as a in the retinue of .

Different Accounts

Manner of death: the details of imprisonment, starvation and the cutting and roasting of the feet are found only in the later commentaries of the Southern tradition; the Chinese Mahīśāsaka Vinaya says only that Ajātasattu “took his father's life”; the Saṅghabhedavastu of the Chinese Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya has the crown prince imprison the old king after his accession, with the queen bringing food every day.

More differences between accounts (2)

In the Sāmaññaphala Sutta of the Southern tradition and the Shamenguo jing of the Chinese Dīrgha Āgama, Ajātasattu admits with his own lips that he killed his father; the Chinese Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya also says Ajātasattu was deeply troubled after killing his father.

The Chinese Sarvāstivāda Vinaya uses “the death of King Pingsha (that is, Bimbisāra) and the accession of King Ajātasattu” as the temporal setting of a Vinaya case.

Dating

Conjecturally Year 38 after the Awakening, the Buddha aged seventy-two, inferred as the same year as the abdication; the canonical texts do not say how long passed between the abdication and the death, and the Chinese Mahīśāsaka Vinaya says only “not long after”. This is the result of inference from the sequence of events and from the Buddha's age; the season is unknown and the year is not certain.

Related Entries

Year
Places
People
Discourses
Research Notes: Reliability, Dating and Sources
How Reliability Is Assessed

The episode of “Bimbisāra dies at the hands of Ajātasattu” is recorded by five schools, the Pali canon of the Southern tradition, the Chinese Dharmaguptaka Vinaya (Sifen lü), the Chinese Mahīśāsaka Vinaya (Wufen lü), the Chinese Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya and the Chinese Saṅghabhedavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya. Attested across multiple schools. Within it, “the smoke-house, starvation and cutting of the feet” is not found in the early sutras and Vinayas of any school.

Dating Evidence and Precision

Inferred from the sequence of events (neither the canonical texts nor the commentaries give the time; the year is worked out from the order of this event and those around it); converted from the Buddha's age (reckoned from the Buddha's age). Time precision: year uncertain.

Sources

Back to Year 38 after the Awakening · The Buddha at 72

Source text

日期怎麼讀

成道第幾年
從佛陀成道開始,每經過一次雨季安居算一年,每一年算到安居結束為止;所有年歲一律依二十九歲出家、三十五歲成道推算。
年份依據
區分經文自己明記、後世註解書記載、先後順序推定及年歲換算。
時間精確度
分別說明確定到日、月、年,或只能放入某幾年之間。
可信度
多派共傳、兩派記載、單派記載與後世補述,表達記載的共傳範圍;與時間及位置是否確定分開閱讀。